The Kite Runner Essay Example for Free

The Kite Runner EssayAn individuals sense of belonging stems from their notions of identity, personal context, and spotlight. A inadequacy in any of these areas may result in a thorough sense of alienation and pose as a barrier, which prevents belonging and facilitates an individuals decision to exclude themselves from their surroundings. However, ironically, these barriers that present hardship can truly liberate an individual and help them in finding a more finish suppose of belonging.These ideas are explored in Shakespeares play, As You Like It and Khaled Hosseinis novel, The Kite Runner. Barriers to belonging are evident in the play in As you analogous it and are explored through gender paradigms, and social structures. Particularly through the family relationship surrounded by Rosalind and Duke Frederick. Due to the usurpation of her father by the disloyal Duke Frederick, Rosalind is unfairly subjected to the biting treatment by her Uncle.He creates suspicion and i solates Rosalind through his diction in, Mistress, dispatch you with your safest haste and get you from our beg. Me, uncle? Here the employment of second person reveals the distancing of Rosalind from the hierarchy. His use of the authoritative emphasises the barrier that will be created. Frederick is presented as a Machiavellian character whose threat, or thou deist emphasises the danger inherent in her vulnerable state.Her picture due to her gender is also evident, when he alludes to the Christian practice of purgation If purgation did consist in words which is associated with a spiritual cleansing, of the body which suggests that Rosalind is unprocessed He also confirms the notion of the impure female by his use of sibilance (to Celia) in She is too subtle for thee and her smoothness,Her very silence He uses juxtaposition amongst Celia and Rosalind to reinforce Celias purity Thou wilt attest more bright and virtuous.Therefore, the issue of sexuality and female deviousness is alluded to. Furthermore, Rs insularity by gender is evident in, Touchstones dialogue as he says to Rosalind, Thus men grow wiser everyday. It is the first time I hear breaking of ribs was sport for ladies. Touchstone does not think wrestling is a sport for ladies to enjoy. In dressing as Ganymede, she acquires a certain freedom to motion around, give advice, and associate as an equal among other men. Breaking free of an external factor and gaining a sense of attachment.Thus her projection of control affects her sense of belonging by challenging the traditional sense of gender roles. Comparatively, The kite runner, explores the disparity created by differences in cultural backgrounds. This connection manifests in the relationship between emir and Hassan, though Amir is true to Hassan in private, he feels the need to relate to Hassan according to the prevailing social hierarchy in public. Afghanistan is the trim back of the Pashtunsnot the flat-nosed Hazaras, these people poll ute our homeland. They flyblown our blood.The inclusive language at the beginning of the quote is aimed at the Pashtuns whereas the negative connotations of pollute and dirty emphasise the subservient position of the Hazaras in the Afghani society and thus losing their sense of placement within society. Amir has to face that fact he is disloyal to his relationship with Hassan and begins personal growth. Hes my servant Had I really though that? Everywhere I turned I saw signs of his loyalty, his damned unwavering loyalty. the absence of conjunction emphasises his thorough regrets that act as a barrier preventing him from belonging.Furthermore, Assef tells Amir Afghanistan is like a beautiful mansion be with garbage This denigrating simile compares Afghanistan to a beautiful mansion, i. e. something that is sacred whilst the Hazara are being compared to garbage, belittling these people. This quote also juxtaposes the concepts of a mansion and garbage where a mansion represents we alth, influence, authority and respect whereas garbage signifies something that defiles an otherwise pristine environment. The discrimination against the Hazaras detaches them from their homeland of Afghanistan and thus limits their dexterity to belong.Through familial relationships, characters from both texts pay off furthered their understanding and ability to belong. From AYLI, Orlando is marginalised and alienated as his jealous older brother Oliver has cut him out of their fathers will and had not educated him as their father wished. The simile, said by Orlando, You have trained me like a peasant likens him to poverty. Orlando is clearly irritated by his mistreatment and as a result catalyses his ability to belong. I will no longer endure it, he says with high modality and hunts into the forest of Arden where he found a sense of acceptance.Through his new-made connection Orlando develops a more enduring connection through Rosalind, who like impresario, provoking characters like Orlando to re-evaluate the quality of relationships. Rosalind uses eloquence rather than verbosity. This is evident in, To Shakespeare love between men and women is grounded in mutual, not just masculine, behaviourwhat has happened between people helps make possible what will happen. Striving to feel a bond of security, Amir was desperate to win his fathers approval. If I hadnt seen the doctor pull him out of my wife with my own eyes, Id never believe hes my son.The short sentences in the quote, are to the point and Baba had not thought twice about the distant relationships between the two nor has he made the effort to better that. Amir, on the other hand, went to the extent to betray his best friend in hopes of gaining the love of his father to fill the void within him that prevented him from any sense of security. Hassan was the value I had to pay, the lamb I had to slay to win Baba The diction here alludes to the religious ceremony of sacrificing a lamb to a greater power, and similarly, Amir sacrifices Hassan to master something greater.Amir and Babas relationship was artificial but through the strain they experienced, Amir was pushed to realise his place in where he truly belonged. There is also an zephyr of political change and unrest in 1970 Afghanistan something roared like thunder. The earth shook a little. This pathetic fallacy, associated with explosions and gunfire associated with the entering of Russian tanks and the death of the Afghanistan I knew. show that the relationship between boys is a stable force similar to Celia and Rosalind in AYLI.An individuals ability to conform is dependent on the place in which they are surrounded by. In AYLI, the juxtaposed locations of the forest and the court constantly remind the audience of the differences between them. The ironic use of you cousin by Duke Frederick clarifies how the court is governed by deceitful intrigue and flawed relationships whereas the biblical allusion to Eden said by Duke Senior feel not the penalty of Adam as they bat the time as carelessly as they did in the golden world signifies the ideal world that man longs to be.The two parallel locations impact the characters when, from the oppression of the city, characters escape to the simple life of nature. Arden acts as a catalyst for their renewal, assisting their ability to arrive at a fuller sense of belonging for when they returned to court and thus is affect by external factor of place. In comparison, the Kite Runner shows the struggle of immigration. Amir along with Baba had to deal with fitting into an entirely different culture.Baba, who expressed a great deal of pride and attachment to his culture, was filled with a loss of identity when he moved to America, hes identity was of a node whilst in Afghanistan he was a successful and influential figure. Amir, on the other hand, finds temporary relief from the guilt he left behind in Afghanistan. confusable to the forest of Arden that provides c haracters with an illusion of paradise in As you like it, America provides Amir with a vacation from the reality of his personal problems.For me, America was a place to bury my memoriesFor Baba, a place to mourn his and thus demonstrating the importance of external factors such as place. To conclude, even though the texts are different they are traffic with universal themes of discrimination, familial connections and dislocation of place. And through these barriers that act to hold back an individuals ability to belong, it also acts as a catalyst for a deeper and more fulfilled state of belonging.

Sustainable Brand luxury Essay Example for Free

Sustainable Brand luxury Es swearIntroduction What is striking is the similarity between the two. I kindle say that sustainability and luxury argon similar to bedfellows. Sadly, this would be nearlywhat naive. Luxury is constantly on move as state by many economists (Kapferer 2008, p. 96). Sustainable behavior with its luxury indicates living harmoniously with mother earth it is employing trained artisum in safe and humane working conditions. Luxury products are often considered to have larger environmental footprints than their peers.There is an area where sustainability now encourages the luxury dream itself. (Exploria Art of Travel) Nature that is unspoiled is rare now, a chain of hotels emerged where the dream is sustainability like Explora in chille with resorts in Atacama and other places, and these are fully positive energy buildings, with no litter. An organic bacterium is used to destroy everything and food is produced through organic res publica by native farmers and so on. Sustainability luxury now Luxury brands are now-a-days interested to turn over a new leaf.Many firms are move to compete with others in their field through environmental and social responsibility as a point of differentiation when competing for the share of consumer wallet which is very close in economic downturn. (Lakshmi Prasanna 2013, pers. Comm. , 18 Feb. ), Luxury has now passed into masses rather than a cream layer. Sustainability luxury have been Luxury brands have been bought by solely those who had money, taste and power. Some products play a role of status symbols and simply they are perceived by public.There is no necessary that these are purify than their less expensive products, are bought with main reason of displaying wealth. (Inconspicuous consumption, 2008) These types of products are objects of socio-economic phenomenon called conspicuous consumption. Sustainability luxury can be or ought to be Luxury brands usually castigate their own standards. Ve ry high gross margins are achieved by Luxury brands and they relay strongly on their reputation, because reputation gives strength to the brand (Tabatoni et al, 2010).People are purchasing luxury goods and are promoting new era of market innovation around sustainability. Every category of good available in the market today includes similar products whose luxury is marked by better quality components and materials. Focus The think of this article is to analyze relationship of luxury and sustainability. Its important to enchant how todays young consumers, so conscious of green values do, balance their continual need for ever-newer fashion with their presumed commitment to environmental sustainability The image1 above you can see European business review 2013.Market demand Luxury brand is very visible sector public attention is wholly conjugate to its high profile customers, VIPs and celebrities. For many years the luxury goods market has been on an upward climb. The industry had a setback in 1997 called the Asiatic Financial Crisis, In 2000 the industry has performed well, the luxury products market in the world which includes drinks, fashion, cosmetics, fragrances, watches, jewelry, luggage, handbags was worth close to $170 billion and grew 7. 9 percent. Only (-0. 9 percent) rectify was suffered by this sector, which was the lowest (Okonkwo, 2007 pg.145).(Epsten roy 2003) Today sustainability is regarded as virtually important business perceptive by multiple people such as investors, stake holders, customers and policy catchrs. Horizons of sustainability Raising awareness In regard with sustainability the companys are taking much regard in making changes that support the term sustainability, the to a greater extent than the changes are made they will tend to become part of the companys identity and mix up into their overall strategy, leading not however to greater sustainability but also greater trust from consumers.By remaking the fundamental value s of luxury, sustainability can helper to clearly check its difference versus more common bounteousness brands. At a time when sustainability is still not well understood or accepted by many people, the influence exerted by luxury brands could play a key role in raising both awareness and also helping to drive behavioral change in consumers. First input must come, not from consumers, but from pioneering brands (Leslie). Brands that will- Encourage reparability and yearn life of product Promote principle of buy less and pay more. disappear and reinvent luxury experience. Promote respect for appropriate compensation of craftsmanship. Serve as sustainable trend setter. In order to create demand brands should make their image by raising awareness among consumers. In terms of awareness rising, consumer education and behavior change campaigns, major role can be vie by celebrities but there also range of other possibilities including traditional and social media which can be interestin g, fun and relevant to the audience of all groups. some other event of the luxury market is Luxury Shopping Avenues.Certain thoroughfares like Melbournes Collins Street, Singapores Orchard Road, Amsterdams P. C. Hooftstraat Athens, Chicagos Magnificent Mile, Paris Champs-Elysees, Avenue Montaigne (Wikipedia) area are some places where most luxury brands tend to be concentrated. These are managed by large companies which concentrate luxury goods stores. Positive behavior of buyer schemes For retailers, the challenge is always to bring in customers to their spot as there are many alternatives for customers and help them to understand the benefit in making sustainable choice.Some use incentive schemes which help to keep customers loyal by rewarding them with points that can be spent on virtual markets/ websites. And customer loyalty and willing to pay price premium is particularly important for new ethical brands that are looking to grow. Its said retaining old customer is better tha n finding new customers as finding one costs double then retaining the old one.Barriers Luxury is based on object rarity or can be also said as scarcity. . (J. N.Sheth et al, 2010) High prices limit demand for these products and are the best way to protect future of these resources. Sustainable luxury goods- Do not directly focus on customers. Do not recognize emerging threat from rising global over-consumption. The approach is not holistic. Conclusion Sustainable luxury goods have long standing concern for quality and craft. Blendell and Kleanthous (2007) The choice of consumer to pursue the luxury is linked to the brands stance on important social issues, such as saving the planet.All that can be said is for all we know, we might not get tomorrow to save earth. There are some brands demonstrate how luxury fashion can successfully achieve and market sustainability and ethics. As a consumer myself, I would want to show that I not only screw good quality of the good but that I al so care for environment and I hope most of consumers think alike. References Exploria Art Travel, 8 April 2014, www. exploria. com/sustainability Jagdish NSeth, Nirmala K Sethia, Shanthi Srinivas, 2010 Mindful Consumption A Customer Centric Approach To Sustainability Academy of Marketing Science, US Kapferer, Jean-Noel, 2008 The New Strategic Brand Management fourth ed. Kapferer, Jean-Noel, 2013 The European Business Review www. europeanbusinessreview. com/? p=2869 Okonkwo, uche, 2007 Luxury fashion branding Trends, Tactics and Techniques Tabatoni, O Kapferer,J-N, 2010 Are Luxury Brands Really A Financial ambition? HEC Paris, Research Paper,July 2010 Virginia postrel, 2008, Culture and commerce Inconspicious consumption http//www.theatlantic. com/magazine/archive/2008/07/inconspicuous-consumption/306845/ Leslie pascaud, Director sustainable marketing and innovation practice, viewed 8 April 2014 www. addedvalue. com Partridge, D. J. 2011 Activist capitalism and supply elevate cit izenship producing ethical regimes and ready to wear cloths current 52 (s3).Blendell, J and Klenthous, A 2007 Deeper luxury quality and style when the world matters Godalming wwf. uk Ceri Heat Cote- The ethical fashion, 17 sept 2012 http//source. ethicalfashionforum. com/article/marketing-sustainability-for-the-luxury-fashion-sector- Wikipedia.

Stop gambling Essay Example for Free

Stop playing period EssayToday, Im going to let out about looseness. Nowadays, gambling becomes a entertainment in our life. Some people go in that location just for fun, but most people go there for money, they think they can make money by gambling. As we known, only very few people can make money from gambling, the winner everlastingly not belong to gamblers, so the problem comes out. Most people with gambling problems say they lost control over how much time and money they send packing on gambling. Meanwhile, they ignored other responsibilities. They knew they had problems, but only gambling seemed important. Many people who gamble overly digest mixed feelings about gambling.They know they are causing problems for the people they love. They may become anxious and unhappy, and often hate themselves. They feel they cant give up on all the time, money and emotion they have put into gambling. They cant accept that they will never win the money back what they have lost. So me people lock a appearance believe their system will pay off, their luck will change or they are due to win. Others believe continue to gamble is the only way to get the money back. Eventually they will abide their money, family, even life. Also, it will make some serious consequences, like suicide, crime, and destructive behaviors.Other people announce to quit, but it is not easy. If they quit now, they will feel like a loser. They will have to face all the problems that gambling has caused. But, only to stop gambling can help them to start a new life. So here are some solutions to help people to quit the gambling. 1 Make a decision on a given day when you wake up that you will not gamble. Decide that for this one day you will not gamble. If you have to do it an hour at a time, it is okay. Sometimes you may have to do it in a minute at a time. it is okay, as you tell yourself in a given moment that you will not gamble.Schedule your day in a very structured way so you do not ha ve a lot of free time. This can really help a lot, as you will have no time to gamble. 2. think something at that time to replace your gambling. One of the way to quit gambling is to be able to find healthy replacements that will substitute for your gambling activities. Exercise, go shopping, go out with friends, or do some cooking. You can also watch a movie, or listen to some soft music or do some reading and so on. Anything, and I mean anything not go back to gamble. Your goal is to stop gambling, or begin to reduce gambling frequency. 3.Remember the feeling when you leave the casino or lost a lot of money on a bet. Think about how bad it feels when you lose a lot of money. Remember that feeling, and allow yourself to feel that feeling when you are gambling again. Sometimes these feelings can exactly imitate how you feel after a gambling. This can really stop you from going out and placing a bet. So my conclusion is gambling as a entertainment is ok for people, but if you abstr act to it, eventually you will get hurt. So before gambling, please ask yourself, how you going to be responsible of yourself, your family, and your future.

Feminist Perspective on the Family

Feminist Perspective on the FamilyA Woman/s Place Was in the Home Has feminism Finished the Family?Government debates and or so religious discourse harks back to what Finch (1989) has described as the myth of a golden age of the family. Various studies on the family guide to suggest that in Western societies family forms have differed depending on wider social events such as the Industrial Revolution and as well as demographically. In England for example, family patterns in rural beas and in poor beas differ from those in more(prenominal) affluent areas. In poorer areas families are more likely to involve wider relationships such as grandparents and aunts and uncles. During the nineteenth century the nous of the nuclear family became the about prevalent. This is what is often referred to as the handed-down family and the opening of what have been called traditional values. It is this family form that has attracted the most criticism, especially from libbers. Even without a feminist re get wind there have been widespread experiences of changes in the UK and other Western countries during the last forty years concerning hymeneals, household, and family forms. These are changes that would have been unimaginable before the Second human War (Giddens, 2001). People wait longer before getting hook up with and more people are less likely to marry than used to be the case. What has been called second wave feminism began in the 1960s. Many of its opp unitynts argue that it is feminism which has led to a drop in the come in of marriages, greater divorce pass judgment among those who do marry, and a consequent rise in the number of single parent families. Before the late 1960s having a child out of marriage ceremony was still a source of great social shame merely during the closing years of the twentieth century the number women who had children but were non married continued to rise. Figures available for 1997 indicate that at that m this group made up 42% of all lone parent households ( amicable Trends, 2000). Although feminism has been cited as the pass water of such changes, this criticism is based on the view that the traditional family was an eternal form until women challenged this view.This paper provide begin with a definition of key concepts. It provide then look at the concept and history of the family. It will examine the notion that a womans impersonate was in the home until the orgasm of feminism. It will look at different family forms and then assess whether feminism has brought about the end of traditional ideas of the family.FamilyMurdock 1949 describes a family in the following wayThe family is a social group characterized by common residence, economic co-operation and reproduction. It includes adults of some(prenominal) sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual relationship, and one or more children, own or adopted, of sexually cohabiting adults (Murdock, 1949).1Family forms vary a cross societies but theorists maintain that the most prevalent form is the nuclear family described below. big family units are referred to as ex break awayed families.FeminismWomen have argued for equal rights with men since the 18th ampere-second when Mary Wollstonecraft (1792) wrote her Vindication of the Rights of Women. Other women followed in her stead, the most storied being the Pankhurst sisters and the suffragettes who fought for womens right to vote (Abbott andWallace, 1997). Modern feminism began in the 1960s with the go bad of American writer Betty Frieden (1965) and this has come to be k promptlyn as second wave feminism. Alister McGrath (1993) has written that,Feminism has come to be a significant component of modern western culture. At its heart, feminism is a worldwide movement running(a) towards the emancipation of women. The older term for the movement-womens liberation- expressed the item that it is at heart a liberation movement directing its efforts towar d achieving equality for women in modern society, especially through the removal of obstacles-including beliefs, values, and attitudes- which hinder that process (McGrath, 1993111).The Concept and History of the FamilyThe family is the primary place of socialization and the place where children are introduced to the norms and values of a given society (Talcott Parsons,1951). Parsons work referred to what has come to be k presentlyn as the nuclear family. Nuclear families consist of parents and children living together, family members ostensibly provide mutual passion and support. It is this support that enables individual family members to contribute to society and lead productive haves (Giddens, 2001). In the nuclear family one of the adults is employed outside the home and there should be an unexclusive sharing of income (Cheal, 1991).Theorists such as Murdock (1949 cited in Giddens, 2001) have argued that traditional concepts of the family are to be found in all societies and that the family is a necessary and central administration in society.Whether one regards traditional notions of the family as being pertinent to all societies depends largely on how the family is defined, certainly it power be argued that the nuclear model is no longer the norm in contemporary society. Willmott and Young (1957) undertook what has come to be regarded as one of the most important studies on the sociology of the family in Britain. The work investigated families and family support in East London during the 1950s. The study was under obligen at a time when housing policies and greater financial rewards meant that when a couple married they were able to nonplus up home on their own. Increased geographical mobility in like manner meant that many young couples lived a good distance from their families. As a consequence of this and the fact that more women were functional outside the home it was argued that the division of crusade in the home was changing, as more wom en went out to work so men would take on more domestic help chores. Willmott and Young (1957) believed that the family would become a more democratic institution where work, finance, and family responsibilities were shared. Willmott and Young maintained that with the passing of time the family would become more symmetrical i.e. that the changing temper of men and womens roles would mean that their family roles would become interchangeable (Abbott and Wallace, 1997). Feminists challenge this view Walby (1990) maintains that the family is still a site of oppression for women and that this is the place where their roles are perpetuated. Furthermore, feminist writers such as Abbott and Wallace (1997) have argued that the nuclear model of the family is too narrow. They also claim that such a concept neglects the fact that not all family members experience deportment in the same way, or receive equal measures of support. Goode (1963)argues that social systems such as the family, are c reatorful agents of control because to some extent their existence is founded on force. Within social systems such as the family this is often unrecognized, because it is hidden it is effectual. Gittens (1992) is of the opinion that in modern BritainI adopts of family relationships have become enshrined in our legal, social, religious and economic systems which, in turn, reinforce the political orientation and penalise or ostracise those who transgress it (Gittens, 1992, p.74). The Family and IdeologyIn pre-industrial society most of the household chores were undertaken by children. There was little distinction amidst home and work, the private and public spheres, families generally worked the land and they did this together. The rise of industrialization and the growth of the towns brought massive changes to what had constituted the family and family life up until that time. Oakley (1981) maintains that the coming of the factories replaced the family as the unit of production. I n 1819 the Factory issue was introduced and this resulted in the growing dependence of children, and also to womens increased dependence on men and their restriction to the private sphere. During the 19th and early 29th Centuries there was a growing resistance to the employment of married women as wage earners. This was because working women were perceived as threatening to male employment and so there was pressure to keep them at home (Hacker, 1972). The nineteenth century witnessed the embedding of gender roles which were epitomized in mens idealisation of the feminine. Women were seen to be both physically and emotionally weaker than men and therefore not suited to the same roles. The following is a rationalisation for mens idealistic views of women and why they were confined to the home.No woman can or ought to know very oft of the mass of meanness and hatred and misery that is loose in the wide world. She could not learn it without losing the bloom and freshness which it is her mission in life to preserve (Quoted in Hudson, 197053-4).Victorian ideology said that women were created to help men and this became the rationalization for their confinement to the home. To start with this primarily affected the middle classes, as the century progressed, however, the working classes were also subjected to this ideology. Oakley (1981) maintains that this had the effect of lockup women into the housewife role, advertise cementing the growing ideology of gender roles. Murdock (1949 in Giddens, 2001) argued that gender roles are the natural result of the biological differences between men and women. Such differences, he maintained, made the sexual division of beat back party the most sensible way of organising society. This view became endemic in society and has affected much Government policy. When Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979 the Conservatives were calling themselves the party of the family. They maintained that people should be discouraged from c ohabitation or from homosexuality and supported the patriarchal nuclear family where the father was the person to apply behavioural standards. Even though single parent families, extended families and reconstituted families were becoming more prevalent at the time these were not regarded as the norm or as desirable (Abbott and Wallace, 1997). Barrett and McIntosh (1980) have argued that ideas centred on a man being able to earn enough to support a family benefited the capitalist economy and the working man at the expense of women. They maintain that this idea of a family wage is still embedded in society and has been a major aspect of womens inequality with men. The idea that a man was entitled to earn a family wage but women were not has meant that women have, (and still do in a number of areas) earn less than men. Furthermore, the low pay which accompanies what is often termed womens work means that womens choices are restricted and their economic power within marriage has been r educed.Changing Work PatternsEven though there had been widespread resistance towards women working outside the home Oakley (1981) maintains that this began to change after the first World War, and between 1914 and 1950 the number of women working outside the home showed a steady increase. In spite of this their primary role was still seen in terms of being a housewife. Since the 1960s women have been struggling to achieve participation in paid employment which is equal to that of men. This has been the case for women from all walks of life (Abbott and Wallace, 1997). These struggles resulted in the introduction of the qualified Pay Act in 1970 which meant that women were entitled to the same pay as men if they were doing the same job. In 1975 it became illegal under the Sex Discrimination Act to discriminate against women in education, in employment, and in the provision of goods. The European Court demanded a strengthening of the Equal Pay Act in Britain in 1982. This was followe d by a further amendment in 1984 which allowed that women were entitled to the same pay as men in their organisations providing they could prove that their work involved the same kinds of decision fashioning and skills as their male counterparts. Women should have equal access and an equal chance for promotion. Some jobs were regarded as outside the confines of the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act e.g. save women could work in a womens refuge (Haralambos et al 2000).Feminist Criticisms of the FamilySince the 1970s and 80s the main sociological focus on families has been concerned with the experiences of women and children, furthermore, the highlighting of these experiences has generated a growth in awareness that the family is an ideological form that does not always work in everyones best interests. Feminists have highlighted the fact that for centuries women have been the sub due(p) sex in society and that this mastery is largely a result of their biology i.e. the fact that they hav e been born women rather than men. Feminists maintain that there is a disjuncture between womens experiences of being in a family as wives and aims and ideologies of domesticity. For a long time many women have felt extremely dissatisfied with the role ascribed to them once they are married and it was this dissatisfaction that Betty Friedan (1965) was seeking to express when she referred to the experience of American housewives in the 1960s as suffering from the problem that has no pee-pee. For some women the ideal of family life is seen as desirable, but their experiences within their own families, falls far short of that ideal (Stanley and Wise, 1983).The gender roles that women have been assigned are constructed on the basis of this biological difference rather than such roles being innate (Abbott and Wallace, 1997). Gender roles are socially constructed and reinforced through the family and the education system. This is do through the different ways that authority figures hav e of relating to boys and girls, and the fact that there is a temperament to give girls dolls and tea sets, and to give boys toy cars and construction sets (Firestone, 1971). However, Connell (1987) has argued that this view tends to ignore the capacity of individuals to accept or reject the social expectations that are embedded in gender roles. Thus Connell maintains that boys and girls may choose elements from each others roles e.g. the tendency of some girls to become involved in competitive sports, and boys dressing in drag when alone. Connell (1987) has said that this may result in males and females building themselves a romance life that is in contradiction to their public actions, thus gender roles can be interchangeable. Feminists have also pointed out that gender socialization is evident in a hidden curriculum in the education system where books that represent males and females in traditional roles reinforce the view that men and women have different paths in life. Until the late 1980s girls were less likely than boys to achieve the requisite number of A levels to enter university. In recent years the focus has tended to be on the growing underachievement of boys because girls are matching or exceeding boys across the curriculum and thus there are more women entering higher education. This does not, however, give them much advantage in the job market where they are disadvantaged in comparison with males who have the same qualification levels(Epstein, et al, 1998). Despite these things Moore (2002), maintains that things are changing, men are taking on more domestic responsibility than they were 20 years ago and often have a much greater involvement with their children than in the past. This has gained official recognition through the introduction of parental leave. In the past, although mothers were entitled to maternity leave, fathers did not have paternity leave. Parental leaves allows both parents to legitimate time off, however, unless men have sympathetic employers, this leave is unpaid and so often not taken. Changes within families has also meant (as mentioned earlier) that the structure of the family itself is changing.As it has already been noted, womens subordination increased with the rise of industrialisation and the separation between public and private spheres (Oakley 1981). The continuing erosion of this distinction over the latter half of the 20th Century has been a significant factor in the changing record of the family. There are a number of forces at work in the decline of what has been called the traditional family. Feminists have highlighted these changes while at the same time exposing the unequal power relationships that exist within society and within the family (Harding, 1987, Walby, 1986). They relate this inequality to the patriarchal nature of society. Rich (1976) has argued that patriarchy is a social and ideological system where men determine the roles that women should or should not play in soci ety. Oakley (1981 and Pahl (1983)2 have cited the division of roles, both within the family, and in the wider society, as a major site of oppression for women. Traditionally the man has been seen as the breadwinner once children arrive and this puts the woman at a disadvantage as research has shown that there is a relationship between money, power and inequality (Vogler, C and Pahl, J.1999)3. Because the family has been seen as the primary site of socialization (Parsons, 1951), it is also a useful place for social conditioning where obedience to authority lays the foundation for the submissive workforce that capitalism requires. Delphy (1977) has argued that gender differences are socially constructed and they tend to serve the interests of the dominant groups in society. Delphy further contends that women should be treated as a separate class because the categories of man and woman are not biological, but political and economic categories. Therefore women form a class who are explo ited by men, and this is particularly evident in the nuclear family. Thus, Delphy writesWhile the wage-labourer sells his labour power, the marrie woman gives hers away exclusivity and non-payment are intimately connected. To supply unpaid labour within the framework of a universal and personal relationship (marriage) constructs primarily a relationship of slavery (Delpy, 197715).Marxist feminists argue that while Marxism may give an explanation of exploitation by the capitalist system it does not explain the inequalities between women and men, as Delphy (1977) maintains gender and sexual inequality should be the fundamental categories of feminist analysis. Marxism alone does not explain for example why women should be seen as responsible for household tasks and capitalism could just as easily still profit if men stayed at home The Community Care Act of 1990 has imposed further responsibilities on women in the role of informal carers, this places considerable stress on womens healt h, particularly as nowadays many women who have a family also work outside the home. Dalley (1988) argues that much Governments policy making, particularly the idea of community care is based on outmoded notions of the ideal family, where most married women do not go out to work, and b) it is the womans duty to assume the caring role. Under such circumstances it is widely delusive that the caring that women do in the home is a natural part of womens role within the family even though many more women work than used to be the case.Changing Family StructuresSince the Second World War there has been a dramatic rise in womens participation in the workforce, although a lot of this has been part-time employment. The 1991 Census shows that the workforce was 47% women although there were regional and cultural variations and single women are more likely to be employed than are married women. This is largely because womens participation in the labour market is affected by their domestic resp onsibilities (Abbott and Tyler, 1995). Many women spend time out of the labour market when they have young children and then may work part time while children are at school only returning to luxuriant employment when their children are older. Few women have continuous careers as a result of their domestic responsibilities. Although child care arrangements do have an effect on womens working patterns, lack of proper child care is not the only reason women do not participate more fully in the workplace. For example, while the number of women in work has continued to rise only a third of single mothers with young children are economically active (HMSO, 1999). This is due to the fact that, despite Government initiatives such as Sure Start Centres, most lone mothers do not have either sufficient otiose support to return to the workplace, or can only take low paid work which may leave them worse off than they were on benefits. In addition to this the welfare system was formed on the bas is that the traditional nuclear family, with a man at its head, should be the norm. It is not, therefore, set up to deal with the increasing number of single parent households (Moore, 2002). Government continued concentration on the notion of the traditional family, tends to make single parent families appear as deviant, when in fact this type of family has become more prevalent as have other family forms.Gittins (1993) maintains that there are a wide variety of domestic relationships and that although relationships may be universal, the can take an infinite variety of forms. Besides the nuclear family there is the extended family, often a feature of minority ethnic groups. There are also many single parent families, whether through death, divorce or choice. Second marriages that often result in what is known as reconstituted families, e.g. where one or both partners have children from other relationships, are also becoming more prevalent. The last twenty years have also seen a rise in the number of people living together, or cohabiting, without the bonds of marriage. Different family relationships are also more evident due to the different ethnic groupings that now make up the UK (Giddens, 2001). Different attitudes towards those people who are not heterosexual has meant that an increasing number of gay and lesbian men and women now choose to live together as couples, and may or may not have children.4 According to Hartley-Brewer (1999) contends that the family (as we have known it) is evolving, rather than the emphasis being on mother and father it should be on nurturing parents of whatever sex. It might therefore be argued that the home may soon cease to be the specific place for women and could become the place for dependent children and caregiver, who may not necessarily be a biological parent.ConclusionThis assignment has looked at the concept and history of the family and at feminist criticisms. As noted earlier an increasing number of families are matr iarchal or matrifocal, this is often the case in Caribbean families. This has generated debates about whether fatherless families are the source of an increasing number of social problems. Dennis and Erdos (1992) maintain that without adult examples of the proper conduct in relationships the children from families with absent fathers will not have the ability to become effective members of a social group. It is further argued that if a boy grows up without a father present then he will struggle to be a successful parent himself. Blankenhorn (1995) has argued that the high divorce rates of Western nations does not mean simply the absence of fathers from the home but the erosion of the idea of fatherhood, and that this will have lethal consequences. Fukuyama (1997) maintains that the roots of the disruption of society and of the traditional family can be attributed to the rising numbers of female employment. This, he argues, changes mens perceptions of women, they now perceive women a being more capble and independent and thus able to care for a child without a mans help. It is Fukuyamas (1997) lean that the emancipation of women can lead to the further abdication of responsibility by men. Clearly a number of social and historical forces have contributed to the changing nature of the family. Many of these forces have been highlighted in feminist work, whether or not feminism has brought about the death of the family is a matter of opinion. On the evidence presented above it might be argued that feminism itself was the result of social, historical, and economic processes and it is these processes, rather than feminism, that is changing our view of what constitutes a family.BibliographyAbbott and Wallace, 1997 An Introduction to Sociology Feminist Perspectives. London, RoutledgeAbbott and Tyler 1995 Ethnic variation in the female labour force a research notein British Journal of Sociology 46 pp 330-353Allan, Graham and Crow, Graham 2001 Families, Households and S ociety Basingstoke PalgroveBarrett and Mcintosh 1980 The family wage Some problems for socialists and Feminists Capitlalism and Class 11 pp51-72Blankenhorn, D 1995 Fatherless America New York, Basic BooksCheal,m D 1991 The Family and the State of Theory Hemel Hempstead, Harvester, WheatsheafConnell, R. 1987 Gender and Power Society, the Person and Sexual Politics Cambridge, PolityCoontz, S, and Henderson, P. eds. 1986. Womens Work, Mens Prosperity. London, Verso.Crow, G. and Hardey, M. 1992 Diversity and ambiguity among lone-parent households in Modern Britain in Marsh, C. and Arber, S. eds 1992 Families and Households Divisions and Change. London, Macmillan.Dalley, G. 1988 Ideologies of caring Rethinking Community and Collectivism London, MacmillanDelphy, C 1977 The Main Enemy London, Womens Research and Resource CentreDennis, N and Erdos, G 1992 Families without Fatherhood London, IEA health and Welfare UnitEpstein et al 1998 Failing boys Issues in Gender and Achievement Buckingh am, OUPFinch, J 1989 Family Obligartions and Social Change Cambridge, Polity cheerFirestone, S. 1971 The Dialectic of Sex The Case for Feminist Revolution London, CapeFriedan, B 1965 The Feminist Mystique, Penguin Books, HarmondsworthFukuyama F. 1997 The End of Order London, Social Market FoundationGiddens, A. 2001 4th edition. Sociology. Cambridge, Polity Press.Gittens, D. 1993 The Family in Question Changing households and familial ideologies London, MacmillanGoode w. 1963 World Revolution and Family Patterns New York, Free PressGraham, H. 1993 Hardship and Health in Womens Lives Hemel Hempstead, Harvester/WheatsheafHacker, H. 1972 Women as a Minority Group in Glazer-Malbin and Waehrer eds. 1972. Woman in a Man-Made World. Chicago, Rand-McnallyHaralambos,M. Holborn, M. and Heald, R.2000. 5th ed. Sociology Themes and Perspectives. London, Harper Collins.Hartley-Brewer, J. 1999 homosexual couple will be legal parents Guardian 28th October 1999Hartmann, H. 1981. The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism toward a more progressive union in Sargent, L. ed. 1981 The distressed Marriage of Marxism and Feminism A Debate on Class and Patriarchy. London, Pluto PressHMSO 1999 Social Trends 29 London, HMSOHudson, K., 1970. The Place of Women in Society. London, Ginn.McGrath, A 1993 Modern Christian Thought, Blackwell, OxfordMoore, S 2002 Social Welfare Alive (3rd ed) Cheltenham, Nelson ThorneMurdock, G. 1949. Social Structure. New York, Macmillan.Oakley, A. 1981. Subject Women. Oxford, Martin RobinsonParsons, T. and Bales, R. 1955. Family, Socialisation, and Interaction Process. Glencoe, Illinois Free PressParsons, T. 1951 The Social System New York, The Free PressStanley and Wise 1983 Breaking Out London, RoutledgeWalby, S 1986 Patriarchy at Work, Cambridge, Polity.Walby,S. 1990. Theorising Patriarchy. Blackwell, Oxford.Walby,S. 1997. Gender Transformations. London, RoutledgeWillmott and Young 1957 Family and Kinship in East London London, HarmondsworthWollstonecraf t, M 1792 The Disenfranchisement of Women, in Schneir, M (ed.) 1996 The Vintage Book of Historical Feminism, Vintage, London1Footnotes1 Quoted in Haralambos and Holborn, 2000504 no page given for Murdock quote.2 Cited in Abbott and Wallace 1997 ibid.3 Ditto4 Either through the word sense process, artificial insemination, or an earlier heterosexual relationship

Contemporary Hospitality Industry Assignment Tourism Essay

Contemporary Hospitality Industry Assignment Tourism EssayThe main aim of this report is to leave behind a brief description of the hospitality industry in UK along with its size, scope and diversity in order to convince the panel of potential giftors to invest in the hospitality industry.My focus consultancy firm was asked to produce a formal report waysing on the foreign business batch to help them to decide whether to invest or not in particular sector of the industry for the coming capital of the United Kingdom 2012 Olympic games.It will provide them a brief description of disparate ownership styles, management styles as soundly as organisational social organization of several opposite sectors of the hospitality industry.Moreover, it will in any case provide the detail analysis of underway trends, issues and recent developments within the industry.There ar different sectors in the hospitality industry like hotels, restaurants, clubs and chuck outs, contract catering, casinos etc.The particular sector that I am going to way is the alteration sector i.e. hotel and I am presenting the ideas that i have generated while doing the research.Hospitality industry is a very broad industry.It is not always on the loose(p) to define the hospitality industry.There ar different criteria of defining it.One of the way of defining hospitality industry is by using Standard Industrial Classification(SIC) which was founded in united Kingdom in 1948.It defined the hospitality industry under the 1968 classification, as Establishments (whether or not licensed for the sale of intoxicating liquors)providing meals, light refreshments, drink or accommodation. (jones, 2002).Hospitality industry is defined as hotel, motels, inns or such businesses that provides transitional or short-term lodging, with or without food.(Businessdictionary.com). two definition suggests that hospitality industry is the industry which provide food and accommodation to the thickening.Hosp itality industry is made up of two distinct services- provision of overnight accommodation for people staying away from home, and the provision of sustenance for people eating away from home or not preparing their own meals. (jones, 2002).British Hospitality Trends Developments 2010 which was published today has revealed that, despite the recession, the UK hotel industry is continuing to expand, with over 10,400 inhabit opening in 2010 and a further 43,000 planned for the period 2011-2015.(British Hospitality Association,14/11/2010).The hotel industry is flourishing every year.Moreover, the tourist coming to the UK especially capital of the United Kingdom is never stopping.The amount spent by overseas visitors to the UK rose by 15.9% during July 2010 to 1.96b, compared with 1.69b during the same month of 2009, according to the Governments latest Overseas Travel and Tourism figures. The tour of overseas visits to the UK outgrowthd by 4.9% to 3.24 million during this period, compa red with 3.1 million in July 2010.(Caterersearch.com).By looking at the figures above we fucking say that it is secure and safe to invest in the hotel industry.There are various sectors in the accommodation where businessman can invest.They can invest in different events of set up hotels, business and conference hotel,budget hotels, dress shop hotels, motels,lodges etc.They can invest in the existing property or build up hotels by themselves.If they invest in chain and popular hotels they may lay aside the time and money for the advertisements and promotions.Budget hotels are also getting popular nowadays because of the low disposable income.People want to spend less money and get candid facilities and service.Moreover, they can also construct a new hotel by themselves where they can be the sole owner and can have control over the cyberspace and loss of the business.Business people can also buy the franchising license or do the management contracting.Scale, scope and diversity The hospitality is one of the life-sizedst and fastest suppuration industry in the world. There are just over 46,000 hotels and lymph gland houses in the UK, and the hotel industry remains a significant sector of the economy, with an annual derangement of nearly 40billion (Trends Statistics, 2008, British Hospitality Association). According to the British Hospitality Association, the industry is made up of about 127,000 properties and employs a workforce of 1.6 million people.It is very large and diverse industry.It is the third largest company that provides employment.The scope of the UK hospitality industry is very big.There are different commercial sector like hotels, restaurants, fast food outlets, takeaways, motels, hostels, pubs, clubs etc whereas the welfare sector like educational institutions, halls of residence, hospitals, old age homes, prisons etc.Many tourists are coming to the country every year as the london is popular city around the world.We can find many bi g hotels in london in order to accommodate large no. of tourists every night.Therefore large no. of workforce is required in order to run such hotels which creates millions of jobs.The hospitality industry is very diverse due to the innovation, ownership, classification and grading system, level of service, leisure facilities, forthcoming trends etc.There are different types of hotel which provide standard services to the knob.The hotel now not only provide the food and accommodation but also provides facilities like internet, gymnasium, naiant pool, sauna bath, jacuzzi, night clubs, shops, hair and beauty salons, laundry, car parking, conference and meeting rooms etc.The ownership and classification of hotel grading system also imbibe it diverse.There are different type of ownership and management style like sole owner, fusion, public limited company and private limited company.The grading system of hotel by rating with stars from 1 to 5 level according to the level of service they provide to their guest.Food service is also one of the weighty facilities provided by the hotel.The facilities provided by the hotel depends upon the type of the hotel.There are one or many restaurants in a hotel.The restaurant provide different type of facilities like ala carte menu, buffet service, bar menu, catered service, room service etc.Nowadays we can usually find a restaurant in every hotel.Thus, food service is one of the important sector of the hotel industry. other important sector of the hotel industry is entertainment.Different types of guest come to the hotel some of them are business people, leisure guest, holiday makers etc.Leisure guest and holiday makers are travelling amply for the purpose of entertainment.They want to utilise their holidays and enjoy a lot.Therefore, the hotel should provide entertainment facilities like night clubs, bars, themed parties, casinos, swimming pools, sauna and jacuzzi, sports facilities etc.They should arrange the indoor act ivities so that the guest dont need to go outside searching such facilities.Organisational StructureOrganistaional bodily structure is the relationhsip between the people and different departments of an organisation.Different organisations have different organisational structure.Some organisations have tall structure whereas some have flat structures.Tall organisational structure is in mainly found in large organisations such as hotels which consists of different levels of staff from the managers to the workers whereas the flat organisational structure do not have many level of staff.For e.g. in a flat stucture of a restaurant an owner can be the manager and the chef as well.The organisation is divided in two different parts front of the house and the back of the house.Front of the house are the departments like food and beverage, accommodation, conference and junket etc whereas back of the house are the departments like finance , food preparation areas, and the areas not seen by the guest.In the accommodation sector you can find different types of ownership and the structure.Mostly two types of ownership are popular in the hospitality industry.They are sole ownership or the franchised.Sole ownership kernel opening hotel by yourself without taking any financial help from other except loans.The advantage of this type of organisation is that the owner have sole access to the profit and can make the hotel according to his ideas and concepts whereas the disadvantage is that you have to bear all the lossess of the business and may not have full support as those of chain hotels.In this type of ownership the owner will have direct control over the business.The hotel can be chain hotel or franchised and it can also be the partnership or limited companies.You can directly own a hotel in the chain or can get it be franchised.You can invest in a chain hotel where you can be a part of renowned chain whereas in franchise system of ownership you need to pay the franchiso r a royalty fee in order to operate the business.In this type of ownership one can save the expense of marketing and promotions as it is already well known by the public.Moreover you will be also less affected by ups and downs in the business as you are part of a chain.Both of the above mentioned ownership and management style is popular in the hotel industry.The solely owned hotel should be more promoted in the market as everybody do not know more about the hotel.They should try to be unique by offering wide range and standard services so that guest would be lured to come back again and refer it to other guests.On the other hand the chain hotel should try to maintain their standards as compared to the other chain hotels so that the guest would feel the same standard of service like in any other chain hotel.Contemporary issuesThe hospitality industry is facing many coetaneous issues in todays world.There are lot of managerial and operational issue in the hospitality industry.Some o f the direct issues are standard operating procedure, food and safety, employee expectations, flexible working, socio- heathenish issues, recruitment and retention, e-commerce etc whereas the managerial issue are key players in the hospitality industry, international aspects, marketing considerations, education and training providers, media issues etc.One of the important managerial issue in the accommodation sector is to direct the key players in the industry.There are lot of big brands who are jumper cable in the market.So, you need to identify who are the key players and see how they manage their organisation in order to achieve their goals and objectives.Therefore, in order to remain competitive with such organisations you need to focus on the marketing strategy and providing good service to the guest.You should monitor the things happening around the organisation and should manage the staff properly in order to increase the level of output.Todays world is filled with compet ition so in order to be in the line you should try to focus on the staff management because if the staff is happy then only the organisation can achieve their goal.The guest judge the hotel by the level of service they provide and the facilities they offer so it is very important to provide look of service to the guest.The operational issue should also be taken into consideration in order to have an stiff organisation.One of the most important operational issue in the accommodation sector is employee expectations.Staff are the person responsible for the smooth operations of an organisation.Employee has lots of expectations from the management.They expect to adopt their performance appraisal from their manager, to get trainings for their career development and growth, flexible working hours, good communication etc.They also want to have promotions and recognition for their hard work.So, it is an important contemporary issue.Therefore, for an organisation to be successful need to a ddress the employee expectations.Another important operational issue in the accommodation sector is standard operating procedure. A standard operating procedure is a company wide formalised structure to handle specific operational activities. (operating procedure from ibis) .It helps to improve the quality and the speed of a particular operational procedure.For example plattering of hotels can be done through internet.It will be easy for the guest to keep the room on internet.They dont need to waste their time by calling the hotel and asking the receptionist for all the details.It is will be also easy for them if they need to make any changes for their booking.Moreover, the receptionist also can utilise their time by doing other important work instead of handling the telephone calls.Changes in last 20 yearsThere have been tremenduous change in the accommodation sector in last 20 years.People have started spending more money in leisure travel and holidays.The innovation of budget a irlines was also the main cause of people travelling from one place to another.Moreover, the budget hotel also came into existence which provided facilities to the guest in cheaper rate.So, people started to spent more money in the hospitality industry as a result of which it flourished significantly.The e-commerce was also introduced where people can book the hotel rooms through internet and make any changes in their bookings.They could find the information of the hotels and can choose the appropriate one.There was also the growth of large chain hotels and hospitality companies all across the world.There was emergence of quick service restaurants and the contract caterers such as garner merchant and compass.Moreover the big companies continue to become even larger through merger and acquisition.These all factors contributed to the significant changes in the hospitality industry.Current trendsThere are various current trends present in the accommodation sector.People have been much conscious about their health as a result of which they are attracted to healthy eating or the organic food.Innovations in technlogy is also one of the current trends.Due to inventions of new technnologies the life of people have become easier.The term globalisation has also created an impact upon the hospitality industry where people are thinking in the term of expanding their business all around the world like Accor groups.They are opening their hotel branches in most of the countries.Not only accor most of the leading hospitality brands are expanding their business all around the world.Consumer spending is also one of the current trends.People are tending to spent more money as a disposable income.Making bookings through the website reservations is also the trend that contribute to flourish the hospitality industry.People can easily book the rooms in the hotels. The current trends has appointed impact upon the hospitality industry.ConclusionThe hospitality industry is composed of two factors.They are accommodation and sustenance.Accommodation is one of the important sector of the hospitality industry.Millions of tourists come to London every year.So thousands of rooms are required to accommodate such tourists.Therefore, it is price worthy to invest in the accommodation sector.Moreover, the 2010 olympics is also coming nearer which means large number of tourists will be coming to this place.As a result they need to build more hotels for the tourists.So the business people can invest in this sector which would be more fruitful.On the other hand there are various contemporary issues facing the accommodation sector.We need to address the operational and managerial issues as soon as possible for the smooth functioning of the organisation.

United States Race Issues :: Racism Race Preudice Essays Papers

United States Race IssuesThe arrest of a Ku Klux Klan member who in 1964 killed two young black men, Charles Eddie Moore and Henry Hezekiah Dee, represents a minor attempt to close the books on a wrongly-dismissed civil rights case. Although this act took place over 40 years ago, the current case shows that race issues be still very much a part of our society. The issues are no longer black and white either. With an increasing number of Hispanics in the United States, the racial quilt has become more complex, which has been of special interest to me in my studies of Spanish language and culture. The Los Angeles Police Department has reported increased violence in recent years, much of it attributed to Hispanic and black gangs fighting each other. We cannot passively watch how these issues play out, but must instead find solutions to live together. In my opinion, the premise that all races are now on a level playing field and have been since the Civil Rights Act leads many American s to strongly oppose anything that seems to unfairly, check to them, favor one race over another, such as affirmative action programs.As a Michigan resident, I unfortunately witnessed the passage of proposition 2, banning affirmative action through what was called the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, modeled after the California Civil Rights Initiative, both of which were led by Ward Connerly. many another(prenominal) Americans think voting against reverse discrimination sounds good, not taking into account the fact that white Americans have had many more years to accumulate wealth and gain better positions in society, while minorities have only had that opportunity for a couple decades and often times still face discrimination. I erudite a lot about affirmative action and other race issues as a student in a class called Race andPolitics, a class in which Mr. Connerly as well as members of the local chapter of the NAACP came to visit and speak.Discussions of race often reached nervous quietness in my class, something I think is prevalent when members of different races come together to talk about it. We stumble all over trying not to offend each other or enunciate something that might be taken offensively. In her book Its the Little Things Everyday Interactions That Anger, Annoy, and Divide the Races, Lena Williams describes how members of all races innocently bother each other without wise(p) it. One example is how white Americans say they dont see color in order to say race is not an issue to them.

Jacob :: essays research papers

Jacob, the son of Isaac and Rebekah, and the twin brother of Esau, was born in Canaan, more or less 2,000 BC. Even before his birth, great things had been predicted of him by the Spirit of the Lord. It was prophesized that although he was the younger born of the twins, he should have dominion, and be the father of a great and stiff nation. The predictions also included his descendents would reign supreme over all the descendents of his elder brother, Esau (Blunt 123).Jacob first appears in the Bible in the book of Genesis. The Bible says that Esau was the firstborn of the twins. by and by his brother came out, with his hand gripping Esaus heel so he was named Jacob. (Genesis 2526). The boys grew up, and Esau was described as a s sweep awayful hunter, while Jacob was a soundless man, living in tents. Once when Jacob was cooking a stew in his tent, Esau came in from the from hunting in the fields and was famished. Jacob told Esau he would share with him his stew on the condition t hat Esau renounce his birthright to him. Esau accepted. Later, as their father, Isaac sat on his deathbed, he blessed Jacob, who was dressed in fur clothing to imitate Esau who had more corpse hair than Jacob. Isaac thought it was Esau he was blessing (Meeks 41). After this, Jacobs mother advised him to go live with his Uncle Labon in Padan-Aram afraid that Esau would become vengeful and kill Jacob after he tricked their father into giving him his blessing of the first born. On his way to Padan-Aram, he came to Bethel to sleep for the night. He took a stone and placed it down the stairs his head. Some critics believe that a correction to our traditional misunderstanding of this stone placing is that Jacob took the stone and placed it not under his head as a pillow, scarce rather at his head for protection. While sleeping here, he dreams of a ladder set up on the earth, reaching all the way up to heaven. He saw the angels of God ascending and descending on it. The opinion of some critics is that what Jacob saw in his dream was not a ladder however a stairway. Some years ago, at a site twenty-five miles northeast of Bethel, archaeologists uncovered the remains of a divided stone stairway leading from the city down to its water source.