Understanding of virtue Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Understanding of deservingness - Assignment Example, n.d.) If this is correct, the virtue of a dressmaker is what enables her to hoist beautiful dresses, or the virtue of a gardener is what enables him to produce a bountiful harvest, or etc.. In this aspect, virtue is different from person to person, but this does not give us a general translation of a virtue. Mackenzie (1985), in her discussions of moral theories, said that Plato has a naturalist approach to evaluative qualities, and to relations which causes complexities. It is Platos reasoning that an object has a particular value to different persons at a different quantify and in a different relation, it is opposite. As digressed By Mackenzie, Plato values of an object vary subjectively, so that to be able to understand it, one must be able to assess and understand it, and that sometimes, these assessments atomic number 18 contradictory, since they are cognitively unreliable. Plato has made a conclusion, as Mackenzie pointe d out, that over and above sensible matters, thither exists entities that give authoritative understanding of values, and these are the Forms which are cognitively reliable, pure instantiations, or absolutes, of value that provide us with the cognition of what is best.Platos representation is hard to follow, as in when he said that when we use a value term twice, it should have the same meaning, in mind. Plato has a view that for any given term, there should only be one Form that represents it all. (Mackenzie) There should be a universal term, but this thing is not possible because of complexity of meaning. Take the word beautiful or noble for example. This means, as I gathered from Platos discourse, a term may have different evaluative meaning equal the words useful, fine and pleasantThe first discourse In Platos dialogue about virtue and the question that lies beneath is whether or not virtue can be taught. His understanding of virtue in the book is that virtue is not a form of knowledge and that it has no clear definition. I cannot exactly